Lumak wrote:Looks good, Modanung! Why do you prefer GPL over MIT. Is it so you can split the license into commercial and free, like Qt lib, in the future?
Would you rather see it licensed MIT? If so, why?
// Copyright (C) 2016 LucKey Productions (luckeyproductions.nl)
// This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
// Commercial licenses are available through email@example.com
Lumak wrote:It's your prerogative to license it however you see it fit, doesn't matter what anyone else wants.
Coincidentally, I opened one of your source files and found the answer.// Commercial licenses are available through firstname.lastname@example.org
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests